Case-IH MX 80 C vs New Holland T 5030

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1998–2000

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2008–2012

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MX 80 C and the T 5030 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH MX 80 C and New Holland T 5030, field by field
Field	MX 80 C	T 5030	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	82.9 hp	75.0 hp	+11% MX 80 C
Engine declared	PERKINS-FASTRAM 1004-40 Turbo-HR	IVECO-NEF F4CE 9484 A	differs
Displacement declared	3.99 L	4.49 L	+12% T 5030
Maximum torque declared	218 lb·ft · 296 N·m	215 lb·ft · 291 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated wet Case-IH multi-disc driving clutch	Electrohydraulically operated wet multi-plate clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Pump flow declared	25.3 gpm · 95.6 L/min	16.5 gpm · 62.5 L/min	+53% MX 80 C
Pressure declared	3,408 psi · 235 bar	3,336 psi · 230 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	10,582 lb · 4,800 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/540E/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	10,582 lb · 4,800 kg	8,267 lb · 3,750 kg	+28% MX 80 C
Maximum permissible mass declared	17,229 lb · 7,815 kg	13,669 lb · 6,200 kg	+26% MX 80 C
Wheelbase declared	95.4 in · 2,422 mm	92.2 in · 2,342 mm	—
Length declared	163.8 in · 4,160 mm	158.7 in · 4,030 mm	—
Width declared	96.7 in · 2,455 mm	78.9 in · 2,005 mm	+22% MX 80 C
Height declared	110.6 in · 2,809 mm	100.2 in · 2,546 mm	+10% MX 80 C
Ground clearance declared	13.4 in · 340 mm	17.2 in · 438 mm	+29% T 5030
Turning radius, braked declared	13.6 ft · 4.15 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	207.1 qt · 196.0 L	134.2 qt · 127.0 L	+54% MX 80 C

Source

Source