Case-IH MX 255 vs Massey Ferguson MF 9240

12 material differences

Tractor one

2002–2005

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1994–1998

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MX 255 and the MF 9240 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

12 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH MX 255 and Massey Ferguson MF 9240, field by field
Field	MX 255	MF 9240	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	258.4 hp	236.8 hp	+9% MX 255
Engine declared	CUMMINS 6 TAA-8304	Cummins 6 CTA 8.3 A	differs
Displacement declared	8.27 L	8.27 L	—
Maximum torque declared	878 lb·ft · 1,191 N·m	660 lb·ft · 895 N·m	+33% MX 255
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Case-IH multi-disc clutch running in oil bath	oil cooled FUNK multi disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Pump flow declared	38.6 gpm · 146.1 L/min	—	—
Pressure declared	3,597 psi · 248 bar	2,756 psi · 190 bar	+31% MX 255
Three-point lift at ends declared	17,939 lb · 8,137 kg	15,144 lb · 6,869 kg	+18% MX 255
Rear PTO speeds declared	1000 rpm	1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	21,559 lb · 9,779 kg	19,872 lb · 9,014 kg	+8% MX 255
Maximum permissible mass declared	30,865 lb · 14,000 kg	26,455 lb · 12,000 kg	+17% MX 255
Wheelbase declared	118.3 in · 3,005 mm	115.0 in · 2,921 mm	—
Length declared	224.0 in · 5,690 mm	194.0 in · 4,928 mm	+15% MX 255
Width declared	120.0 in · 3,048 mm	96.1 in · 2,440 mm	+25% MX 255
Height declared	124.0 in · 3,150 mm	123.8 in · 3,145 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	13.8 in · 350 mm	14.8 in · 376 mm	+7% MF 9240
Fuel tank declared	639.3 qt · 605.0 L	360.3 qt · 341 L	+77% MX 255

Source

Source