Case-IH MX 255 or Lamborghini 265 Traction?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Case-IH MX 255: maximum permissible mass.

  • The Case-IH MX 255 suits road haulage better on this data: 17% (2,000 kg / 4,409 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH MX 255 and Lamborghini 265 Traction, with the call on each
QuestionMX 255265 TractionCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?163.45 kW (219.19 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255”163.4 kW (219.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MX 255 and the 265 Traction.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MX 255 and the 265 Traction.
Which pumps more oil for implements?146.1 L/min (38.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 265 Traction.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?8,137 kg (17,939 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255”7,600 kg (16,755 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?9,779 kg (21,559 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255”9,014 kg (19,872 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255”12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265”AheadThe Case-IH MX 255 has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (2,000 kg / 4,409 lb) than the Lamborghini 265 Traction (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255”18 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MX 255 and the 265 Traction.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265”Sources disagreeNo call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the MX 255.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255”; OECD test report 2188, 20044WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 265”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2002–20051994–1998Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH MX 255 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH MX 255 has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (2,000 kg / 4,409 lb) than the Lamborghini 265 Traction (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH MX 255 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the MX 255.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources