Case-IH MX 210 or Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MX 210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 200 MK3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH MX 210 suits road haulage better on this data: 17% (2,000 kg / 4,409 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MX 210 | Agrotron 200 MK3 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 147.1 kW (197.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210” | 147.2 kW (197.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MX 210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 200 MK3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MX 210 and the Agrotron 200 MK3. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MX 210 and the Agrotron 200 MK3. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 146.1 L/min (38.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210” | 117.9 L/min (31.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3” | AheadThe Case-IH MX 210 has 24% more hydraulic flow (28.2 L/min / 7.4 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 7,597 kg (16,749 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210” | 10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3 has 32% more lift (2,403 kg / 5,298 lb) than the Case-IH MX 210 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 9,165 kg (20,205 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210” | 7,460 kg (16,446 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH MX 210 is 23% heavier (1,705 kg / 3,759 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210” | 12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3” | AheadThe Case-IH MX 210 has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (2,000 kg / 4,409 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210” | 16 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MX 210 and the Agrotron 200 MK3. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210” | 540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210”; OECD test report 2184, 2004 | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2005 | 2001–2004 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH MX 210 has 24% more hydraulic flow (28.2 L/min / 7.4 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3 has 32% more lift (2,403 kg / 5,298 lb) than the Case-IH MX 210 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MX 210 is 23% heavier (1,705 kg / 3,759 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MX 210 has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (2,000 kg / 4,409 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MX 210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 200 MK3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources