Case-IH MX 240 vs New Holland T 8020

6 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1999–2002

235.2 hp

Measured at the PTO · OECD Test 1835

Tractor two

2006–2011

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MX 240 and the T 8020 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

6 material differences · 11 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH MX 240 and New Holland T 8020, field by field
Field	MX 240	T 8020	Gap
Measured performance
PTO power, measured measured	235.2 hp	—	—
Drawbar power, measured measured	200.6 hp	—	—
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	242.6 hp	244.6 hp	—
Engine declared	Consolidated Diesel Co. 6TAA-8304	CUMMINS 6 TAA-8304 (TIER-III)	differs
Displacement declared	8.27 L	8.27 L	—
Maximum torque declared	810 lb·ft · 1,098 N·m	787 lb·ft · 1,067 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Integrated wet Case-IH multi-plate clutch in transmission	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Pump flow declared	31.1 gpm · 117.7 L/min	44.0 gpm · 166.6 L/min	+42% T 8020
Pressure declared	3,408 psi · 235 bar	3,336 psi · 230 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	18,706 lb · 8,485 kg	20,119 lb · 9,126 kg	+8% T 8020
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	20,754 lb · 9,414 kg	21,444 lb · 9,727 kg	—
Maximum permissible mass declared	30,865 lb · 14,000 kg	30,865 lb · 14,000 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	118.3 in · 3,006 mm	121.2 in · 3,078 mm	—
Length declared	222.0 in · 5,640 mm	229.5 in · 5,829 mm	—
Width declared	120.0 in · 3,048 mm	98.0 in · 2,490 mm	+22% MX 240
Height declared	127.9 in · 3,249 mm	131.1 in · 3,331 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	14.9 in · 378 mm	14.6 in · 372 mm	—
Fuel tank declared	634.0 qt · 600.0 L	720.7 qt · 682.0 L	+14% T 8020

Source

Source