Case-IH MX 240 or Case-IH MX 285?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MX 240: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 1835); the MX 285: power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX285”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- The Case-IH MX 285 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 38% (45.0 L/min / 11.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MX 240 | MX 285 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 175.4 kW (235.2 hp)OECD Test 1835Measured PTO power is 3% below the claimed engine power (gross or net not stated) (180.9 kW (242.6 hp)) — a different quantity: the gap is what the engine claim does not reach the shaft. | 180.64 kW (242.24 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX285” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MX 240: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 1835); the MX 285: power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX285”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MX 240 and the MX 285. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | 149.6 kW (200.6 hp)OECD Test 1835 | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MX 285. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 117.7 L/min (31.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX240” | 162.7 L/min (43.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX285” | AheadThe Case-IH MX 285 has 38% more hydraulic flow (45.0 L/min / 11.9 gpm) than the Case-IH MX 240 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 8,485 kg (18,706 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX240” | 9,014 kg (19,872 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX285” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the MX 240: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX240”); the MX 285: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX285”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 9,414 kg (20,754 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX240” | 11,090 kg (24,449 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX285” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH MX 285 is 18% heavier (1,676 kg / 3,695 lb) than the Case-IH MX 240 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX240” | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX285” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX240” | 18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX285” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MX 240 and the MX 285. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX240” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX285” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX240” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX285” | Sources disagreeNo call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the MX 285. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX240” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX285” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDOECD test report 1835, 1999; Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX240” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX285”; OECD test report 2190, 2004 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1999–2002 | 2002–2005 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH MX 285 has 38% more hydraulic flow (45.0 L/min / 11.9 gpm) than the Case-IH MX 240 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MX 285 is 18% heavier (1,676 kg / 3,695 lb) than the Case-IH MX 240 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MX 240: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 1835); the MX 285: power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX285”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the MX 240: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX240”); the MX 285: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX285”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the MX 285.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources