Case-IH MX 180 or Renault Ares 836 RZ?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MX 180: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 1890); the Ares 836 RZ: power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH MX 180 and Renault Ares 836 RZ, with the call on each
QuestionMX 180Ares 836 RZCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?131.0 kW (175.7 hp)OECD Test 1890Measured PTO power is 2% below the claimed engine power (gross or net not stated) (133.9 kW (179.6 hp)) — a different quantity: the gap is what the engine claim does not reach the shaft.132.9 kW (178.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MX 180: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 1890); the Ares 836 RZ: power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MX 180 and the Ares 836 RZ.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?112.6 kW (151.0 hp)OECD Test 1890No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Ares 836 RZ.
Which pumps more oil for implements?119.2 L/min (31.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX180”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Ares 836 RZ.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,455 kg (16,435 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX180”11,560 kg (25,485 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the MX 180: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX180”); the Ares 836 RZ: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?8,725 kg (19,235 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX180”8,150 kg (17,968 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?12,500 kg (27,558 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX180”12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX180”32Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ”AheadThe Renault Ares 836 RZ has 33% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Case-IH MX 180 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MX 180 and the Ares 836 RZ.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX180”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX180”540/1000 rpmOECD test report 2109, 2004EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX180”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDOECD test report 1890, 2000; Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX180”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ”; OECD test report 2109, 2004EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1999–20022001–2005EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault Ares 836 RZ has 33% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Case-IH MX 180 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MX 180: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 1890); the Ares 836 RZ: power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the MX 180: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX180”); the Ares 836 RZ: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 836 RZ”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources