Case-IH MX 150 or Fiat M 160?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MX 150: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 1762); the M 160: power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- The Case-IH MX 150 suits road haulage better on this data: 32% (3,000 kg / 6,614 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MX 150 | M 160 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 106.4 kW (142.7 hp)OECD Test 1762Measured PTO power is 4% below the claimed engine power (gross or net not stated) (110.3 kW (147.9 hp)) — a different quantity: the gap is what the engine claim does not reach the shaft. | 109.4 kW (146.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MX 150: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 1762); the M 160: power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MX 150 and the M 160. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | 103.2 kW (138.4 hp)OECD Test 1762 | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the M 160. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 98.4 L/min (26.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MX 150. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 8,495 kg (18,728 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX150” | 6,680 kg (14,727 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the MX 150: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX150”); the M 160: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,370 kg (16,248 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX150” | 6,080 kg (13,404 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH MX 150 is 21% heavier (1,290 kg / 2,844 lb) than the Fiat M 160 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 12,500 kg (27,558 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX150” | 9,500 kg (20,944 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160” | AheadThe Case-IH MX 150 has 32% higher maximum permissible mass (3,000 kg / 6,614 lb) than the Fiat M 160 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX150” | 18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MX 150 and the M 160. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX150” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX150” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX150” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the M 160. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDOECD test report 1762, 1998; OECD test report 1763, 1998; Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX150” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1998–2002 | 1996–1999 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH MX 150 is 21% heavier (1,290 kg / 2,844 lb) than the Fiat M 160 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MX 150 has 32% higher maximum permissible mass (3,000 kg / 6,614 lb) than the Fiat M 160 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MX 150: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 1762); the M 160: power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the MX 150: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX150”); the M 160: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M160”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources