Case-IH MX 110 or Case-IH MX 120?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Case-IH MX 120: power at the PTO shaft and drawbar power.

  • The Case-IH MX 120 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: 5% (3.9 kW / 5.2 hp) more power at the PTO shaft.
  • The Case-IH MX 120 suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 11% (7.1 kW / 9.5 hp) more drawbar power.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH MX 110 and Case-IH MX 120, with the call on each
QuestionMX 110MX 120Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?77.8 kW (104.3 hp)OECD Test 167981.7 kW (109.6 hp)OECD Test 1678Measured PTO power is 7% below the claimed engine power (gross or net not stated) (88.3 kW (118.4 hp)) — a different quantity: the gap is what the engine claim does not reach the shaft.AheadThe Case-IH MX 120 has 5% more power at the PTO (3.9 kW / 5.2 hp) than the Case-IH MX 110 (both power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power).
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MX 110 and the MX 120.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?64.2 kW (86.1 hp)OECD Test 167971.3 kW (95.6 hp)OECD Test 1678AheadThe Case-IH MX 120 has 11% more drawbar power (7.1 kW / 9.5 hp) than the Case-IH MX 110 (both drawbar power, measured by a laboratory at maximum power).
Which pumps more oil for implements?109.0 L/min (28.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX110”109 L/min (28.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX120”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?5,874 kg (12,950 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX110”5,226 kg (11,521 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX120”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the MX 110: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX110”); the MX 120: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX120”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,265 kg (13,812 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX110”6,265 kg (13,812 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX120”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX110”9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX120”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX110”16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX120”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MX 110 and the MX 120.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX110”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX120”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX110”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX120”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX110”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MX 120.
Which drives on both axles?4WDOECD test report 1679, 1997; OECD test report 1680, 1997; OECD test report 1691, 1997; Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX110”4WDOECD test report 1678, 1997; Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX120”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1997–20021997–2002EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH MX 120 has 5% more power at the PTO (3.9 kW / 5.2 hp) than the Case-IH MX 110 (both power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power).
  • The Case-IH MX 120 has 11% more drawbar power (7.1 kW / 9.5 hp) than the Case-IH MX 110 (both drawbar power, measured by a laboratory at maximum power).
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the MX 110: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX110”); the MX 120: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX120”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources