Case-IH Magnum 7220 or Hürlimann H-6190 Master?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Magnum 7220 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-6190 Master has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH Magnum 7220 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 89% (54.3 L/min / 14.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Case-IH Magnum 7220 suits road haulage better on this data: 16% (1,575 kg / 3,472 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Magnum 7220 | H-6190 Master | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 138.3 kW (185.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220” | 139 kW (186 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6190” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Magnum 7220 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-6190 Master has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Magnum 7220 and the H-6190 Master. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Magnum 7220 and the H-6190 Master. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 115.1 L/min (30.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220” | 60.8 L/min (16.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6190” | AheadThe Case-IH Magnum 7220 has 89% more hydraulic flow (54.3 L/min / 14.3 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-6190 Master (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 8,600 kg (18,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6190” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Magnum 7220. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,560 kg (18,872 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220” | 6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6190” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH Magnum 7220 is 43% heavier (2,560 kg / 5,644 lb) than the Hürlimann H-6190 Master (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 11,575 kg (25,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220” | 10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6190” | AheadThe Case-IH Magnum 7220 has 16% higher maximum permissible mass (1,575 kg / 3,472 lb) than the Hürlimann H-6190 Master (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220” | 27Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6190” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-6190 Master. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6190” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6190” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Magnum 7220 and the H-6190 Master. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6190” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1994–1997 | 1992–2001 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH Magnum 7220 has 89% more hydraulic flow (54.3 L/min / 14.3 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-6190 Master (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH Magnum 7220 is 43% heavier (2,560 kg / 5,644 lb) than the Hürlimann H-6190 Master (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH Magnum 7220 has 16% higher maximum permissible mass (1,575 kg / 3,472 lb) than the Hürlimann H-6190 Master (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Magnum 7220 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-6190 Master has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources