Case-IH Magnum 7220 or Case-IH MXM 175 Maxxum?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Magnum 7220 | MXM 175 Maxxum | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 116.3 kW (156.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220” | 115.0 kW (154.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Magnum 7220 and the MXM 175 Maxxum. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Magnum 7220 and the MXM 175 Maxxum. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 115.1 L/min (30.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220” | 105.0 L/min (27.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 6,995 kg (15,421 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Magnum 7220. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,560 kg (18,872 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220” | 7,165 kg (15,796 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH Magnum 7220 is 19% heavier (1,395 kg / 3,075 lb) than the Case-IH MXM 175 Maxxum (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 11,575 kg (25,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220” | 12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220” | 18 to 28Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MXM 175 Maxxum. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220” | 540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Magnum 7220. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1994–1997 | 2002–2007 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH MXM 175 Maxxum is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH Magnum 7220 is 19% heavier (1,395 kg / 3,075 lb) than the Case-IH MXM 175 Maxxum (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MXM 175 Maxxum is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources