Case-IH Magnum 7220 PRO/8920 or Massey Ferguson MF 3690 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Magnum 7220 PRO/8920 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3690 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH Magnum 7220 PRO/8920 suits road haulage better on this data: 28% (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Magnum 7220 PRO/8920 | MF 3690 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 139.7 kW (187.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220 PRO/8920” | 139.8 kW (187.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3690” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Magnum 7220 PRO/8920 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3690 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Magnum 7220 PRO/8920 and the MF 3690 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Magnum 7220 PRO/8920 and the MF 3690 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 110.5 L/min (29.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220 PRO/8920” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 3690 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,782 kg (12,747 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220 PRO/8920” | 5,420 kg (11,949 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3690” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,901 kg (17,419 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220 PRO/8920” | 6,720 kg (14,815 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3690” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH Magnum 7220 PRO/8920 is 18% heavier (1,181 kg / 2,604 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3690 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 11,500 kg (25,353 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220 PRO/8920” | 9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3690” | AheadThe Case-IH Magnum 7220 PRO/8920 has 28% higher maximum permissible mass (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3690 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220 PRO/8920” | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3690” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220 PRO/8920” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 3690 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220 PRO/8920” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 28 km/h (17.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3690” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220 PRO/8920” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3690” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220 PRO/8920” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 3690 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7220 PRO/8920” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3690” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1997–1999 | 1990–1995 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH Magnum 7220 PRO/8920 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH Magnum 7220 PRO/8920 is 18% heavier (1,181 kg / 2,604 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3690 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH Magnum 7220 PRO/8920 has 28% higher maximum permissible mass (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3690 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH Magnum 7220 PRO/8920 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Magnum 7220 PRO/8920 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3690 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources