Case-IH Magnum 7210 or New Holland TM 155 (Traktorenlexikon)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Magnum 7210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 155 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH Magnum 7210 suits road haulage better on this data: 26% (2,300 kg / 5,071 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Magnum 7210 | TM 155 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 114 kW (153 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210” | 114 kW (153 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Magnum 7210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 155 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Magnum 7210 and the TM 155. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Magnum 7210 and the TM 155. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 110 L/min (29.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210” | 121.7 L/min (32.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155” | AheadThe New Holland TM 155 has 11% more hydraulic flow (11.7 L/min / 3.1 gpm) than the Case-IH Magnum 7210 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 7,200 kg (15,873 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210” | 6,395 kg (14,099 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155” | AheadThe Case-IH Magnum 7210 has 13% more lift (805 kg / 1,775 lb) than the New Holland TM 155 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,525 kg (16,590 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210” | 5,860 kg (12,919 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH Magnum 7210 is 28% heavier (1,665 kg / 3,671 lb) than the New Holland TM 155 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 11,300 kg (24,912 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210” | 9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155” | AheadThe Case-IH Magnum 7210 has 26% higher maximum permissible mass (2,300 kg / 5,071 lb) than the New Holland TM 155 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210” | 18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TM 155. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7210” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 155”; OECD test report 2120, 2004 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1994–1997 | 2002–2007 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TM 155 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland TM 155 has 11% more hydraulic flow (11.7 L/min / 3.1 gpm) than the Case-IH Magnum 7210 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH Magnum 7210 has 13% more lift (805 kg / 1,775 lb) than the New Holland TM 155 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH Magnum 7210 is 28% heavier (1,665 kg / 3,671 lb) than the New Holland TM 155 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH Magnum 7210 has 26% higher maximum permissible mass (2,300 kg / 5,071 lb) than the New Holland TM 155 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TM 155 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Magnum 7210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 155 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources