Case-IH Magnum 7120 or New Holland TM 175 (Traktorenlexikon)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the New Holland TM 175 is ahead on top speed.
- The New Holland TM 175 suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Magnum 7120 | TM 175 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 113.1 kW (151.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120” | 115.0 kW (154.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Magnum 7120 and the TM 175. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Magnum 7120 and the TM 175. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 108.0 L/min (28.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120” | 102.1 L/min (27.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,650 kg (14,661 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120” | 7,507 kg (16,550 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Magnum 7120: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120”); the TM 175: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,532 kg (16,605 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120” | 7,165 kg (15,796 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 11,575 kg (25,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120” | 12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120” | 18 to 19Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Magnum 7120 and the TM 175. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 32 km/h (19.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | AheadThe New Holland TM 175 has 25% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the Case-IH Magnum 7120 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120” | 540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1988–1993 | 2002–2007 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TM 175 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland TM 175 has 25% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the Case-IH Magnum 7120 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TM 175 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the Magnum 7120: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120”); the TM 175: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources