Case-IH Magnum 7120 or Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Magnum 7120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MB-trac 1800 intercooler has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Case-IH Magnum 7120 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 89% (51.0 L/min / 13.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH Magnum 7120 and Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler, with the call on each
QuestionMagnum 7120MB-trac 1800 intercoolerCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?132.4 kW (177.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120”132 kW (177 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Magnum 7120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MB-trac 1800 intercooler has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Magnum 7120 and the MB-trac 1800 intercooler.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Magnum 7120 and the MB-trac 1800 intercooler.
Which pumps more oil for implements?108.0 L/min (28.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120”57.0 L/min (15.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”AheadThe Case-IH Magnum 7120 has 89% more hydraulic flow (51.0 L/min / 13.5 gpm) than the Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,650 kg (14,661 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120”7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Magnum 7120: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120”); the MB-trac 1800 intercooler: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?7,532 kg (16,605 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120”6,350 kg (13,999 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH Magnum 7120 is 19% heavier (1,182 kg / 2,606 lb) than the Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?11,575 kg (25,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MB-trac 1800 intercooler.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120”14Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”AheadThe Case-IH Magnum 7120 has 29% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?—YesTraktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Magnum 7120.
Which is faster on the road?32 km/h (19.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”AheadThe Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler has 25% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the Case-IH Magnum 7120 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MB-trac 1800 intercooler.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1988–19931990–1991EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH Magnum 7120 has 89% more hydraulic flow (51.0 L/min / 13.5 gpm) than the Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH Magnum 7120 is 19% heavier (1,182 kg / 2,606 lb) than the Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH Magnum 7120 has 29% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Mercedes-Benz MB-trac 1800 intercooler has 25% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the Case-IH Magnum 7120 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Magnum 7120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MB-trac 1800 intercooler has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the Magnum 7120: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7120”); the MB-trac 1800 intercooler: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 1800 intercooler”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources