Case-IH JX 95 (A) or Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ: three-point lift. It is also ahead on forward gears and PTO speeds.
- The Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 142% (5,075 kg / 11,188 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | JX 95 (A) | Ares 546 RX/RZ | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 60.6 kW (81.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | 61.2 kW (82.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the JX 95 (A) and the Ares 546 RX/RZ. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the JX 95 (A) and the Ares 546 RX/RZ. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 45.2 L/min (11.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Ares 546 RX/RZ. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,565 kg (7,859 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | 8,640 kg (19,048 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ” | AheadThe Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ has 142% more lift (5,075 kg / 11,188 lb) than the Case-IH JX 95 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,080 kg (6,790 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | 5,165 kg (11,387 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ is 68% heavier (2,085 kg / 4,597 lb) than the Case-IH JX 95 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 7,760 kg (17,108 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the JX 95 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | 32Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ” | AheadThe Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ has 60% more forward gears (12 gears) than the Case-IH JX 95 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the JX 95 (A) and the Ares 546 RX/RZ. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540E/540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ” | AheadThe Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Case-IH JX 95 (A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2004 | 2002–2004 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ has 142% more lift (5,075 kg / 11,188 lb) than the Case-IH JX 95 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ is 68% heavier (2,085 kg / 4,597 lb) than the Case-IH JX 95 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ has 60% more forward gears (12 gears) than the Case-IH JX 95 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Case-IH JX 95 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources