Case-IH JX75 or SAME Golden 65 Compatto?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the SAME Golden 65 Compatto is ahead on forward gears.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH JX75 and SAME Golden 65 Compatto, with the call on each
QuestionJX75Golden 65 CompattoCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?47.1 kW (63.2 hp)OECD Test 262846.9 kW (62.9 hp)OECD Test 1798EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power): the difference is under the 5% threshold, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the JX75 and the Golden 65 Compatto.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?38.6 kW (51.8 hp)OECD Test 262838.8 kW (52.0 hp)OECD Test 1798EvenEven on drawbar power (both drawbar power, measured by a laboratory at maximum power): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which pumps more oil for implements?31.8 L/min (8.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX75”34.4 L/min (9.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 65 (DT) Compatto”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,565 kg (7,859 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX75”1,999 kg (4,407 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 65 (DT) Compatto”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the JX75: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX75”); the Golden 65 Compatto: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 65 (DT) Compatto”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,726 kg (6,010 lb) to 3,145 kg (6,934 lb), varies by configurationTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX75”2,200 kg (4,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 65 (DT) Compatto”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH JX75 is 24% heavier (526 kg / 1,160 lb) than the SAME Golden 65 Compatto (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the JX75 and the Golden 65 Compatto.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12OECD test report 2628, 201145OECD test report 1798, 1998AheadThe SAME Golden 65 Compatto has 275% more forward gears (33 gears) than the Case-IH JX75 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the JX75 and the Golden 65 Compatto.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX75”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 65 (DT) Compatto”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540E/540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX75”540/1000 rpmOECD test report 1798, 1998Sources disagreeNo call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the JX75.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the JX75 and the Golden 65 Compatto.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDOECD test report 2628, 2011; OECD test report 2629, 2011; Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX75”4WDOECD test report 1798, 1998; Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 65 (DT) Compatto”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2002–20041998–2003EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH JX75 is 24% heavier (526 kg / 1,160 lb) than the SAME Golden 65 Compatto (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The SAME Golden 65 Compatto has 275% more forward gears (33 gears) than the Case-IH JX75 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power): the difference is under the 5% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drawbar power (both drawbar power, measured by a laboratory at maximum power): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the JX75: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX75”); the Golden 65 Compatto: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 65 (DT) Compatto”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the JX75.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources