Case-IH JX75 or Lamborghini 675-75 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the JX75: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 2628); the 675-75 (DT): power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 674-75 N”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | JX75 | 675-75 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 47.1 kW (63.2 hp)OECD Test 2628 | 47.7 kW (64.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 674-75 N” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the JX75: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 2628); the 675-75 (DT): power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 674-75 N”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the JX75 and the 675-75 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | 38.6 kW (51.8 hp)OECD Test 2628 | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 675-75 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 31.8 L/min (8.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX75” | 36.8 L/min (9.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 674-75 N” | AheadThe Lamborghini 675-75 (DT) has 16% more hydraulic flow (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the Case-IH JX75 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,565 kg (7,859 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX75” | 2,930 kg (6,460 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 674-75 N” | AheadThe Case-IH JX75 has 22% more lift (635 kg / 1,400 lb) than the Lamborghini 675-75 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,726 kg (6,010 lb) to 3,145 kg (6,934 lb), varies by configurationTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX75” | 2,350 kg (5,181 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 674-75 N” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH JX75 is 16% heavier (376 kg / 829 lb) than the Lamborghini 675-75 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the JX75 and the 675-75 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12OECD test report 2628, 2011 | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 674-75 N” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the JX75 and the 675-75 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX75” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 674-75 N” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540E/540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX75” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 674-75 N” | Sources disagreeNo call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the JX75. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 674-75 N” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the JX75. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDOECD test report 2628, 2011; OECD test report 2629, 2011; Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX75” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 674-75 N” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2004 | 2004–2007 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Lamborghini 675-75 (DT) has 16% more hydraulic flow (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the Case-IH JX75 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH JX75 has 22% more lift (635 kg / 1,400 lb) than the Lamborghini 675-75 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH JX75 is 16% heavier (376 kg / 829 lb) than the Lamborghini 675-75 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the JX75: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 2628); the 675-75 (DT): power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 674-75 N”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the JX75.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources