Case-IH JX 60 (A) or Steyr 360 Kompakt?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the JX 60 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 360 Kompakt has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | JX 60 (A) | 360 Kompakt | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 43.4 kW (58.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX60” | 43.4 kW (58.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the JX 60 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 360 Kompakt has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the JX 60 (A) and the 360 Kompakt. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the JX 60 (A) and the 360 Kompakt. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 52.1 L/min (13.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the JX 60 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,937 kg (6,475 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX60” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 360 Kompakt. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,590 kg (5,710 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX60” | 2,850 kg (6,283 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Steyr 360 Kompakt is 10% heavier (260 kg / 573 lb) than the Case-IH JX 60 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the JX 60 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX60” | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the JX 60 (A) and the 360 Kompakt. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX60” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540E/540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX60” | 430/540/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt” | AheadThe Case-IH JX 60 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Steyr 360 Kompakt does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX60” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 360 Kompakt. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX60” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 360 Kompakt” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2004–2008 | 2004–2008 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Steyr 360 Kompakt is 10% heavier (260 kg / 573 lb) than the Case-IH JX 60 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH JX 60 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Steyr 360 Kompakt does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the JX 60 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 360 Kompakt has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources