Case-IH JX 60 (A) or Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the JX 60 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the AgroXtra 3.57 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH JX 60 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 22% (537 kg / 1,184 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | JX 60 (A) | AgroXtra 3.57 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 43.4 kW (58.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX60” | 43.9 kW (58.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the JX 60 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the AgroXtra 3.57 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the JX 60 (A) and the AgroXtra 3.57. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the JX 60 (A) and the AgroXtra 3.57. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 38.0 L/min (10.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the JX 60 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,937 kg (6,475 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX60” | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | AheadThe Case-IH JX 60 (A) has 22% more lift (537 kg / 1,184 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,590 kg (5,710 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX60” | 3,290 kg (7,253 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 is 27% heavier (700 kg / 1,543 lb) than the Case-IH JX 60 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the JX 60 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX60” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the JX 60 (A) and the AgroXtra 3.57. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX60” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540E/540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX60” | 540/1000/750 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Case-IH JX 60 (A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX60” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX60” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2004–2008 | 1991–1996 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH JX 60 (A) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH JX 60 (A) has 22% more lift (537 kg / 1,184 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 is 27% heavier (700 kg / 1,543 lb) than the Case-IH JX 60 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Case-IH JX 60 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Case-IH JX 60 (A) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the JX 60 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the AgroXtra 3.57 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources