Case-IH JX1090U or Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the JX1090U: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 2279); the AgroXtra 4.57: power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.

  • The Case-IH JX1090U suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 32% (15.0 L/min / 4.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH JX1090U and Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57, with the call on each
QuestionJX1090UAgroXtra 4.57Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?62.1 kW (83.3 hp)OECD Test 227962 kW (83 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the JX1090U: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 2279); the AgroXtra 4.57: power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the JX1090U and the AgroXtra 4.57.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?45.3 kW (60.7 hp)OECD Test 2279No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the AgroXtra 4.57.
Which pumps more oil for implements?62.3 L/min (16.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1090U”47.3 L/min (12.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57”AheadThe Case-IH JX1090U has 32% more hydraulic flow (15.0 L/min / 4.0 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?5,060 kg (11,155 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1090U”5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,855 kg (8,499 lb) to 4,255 kg (9,381 lb), varies by configurationTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1090U”3,780 kg (8,333 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,200 kg (13,669 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1090U”6,600 kg (14,551 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12OECD test report 2279, 200515 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the JX1090U and the AgroXtra 4.57.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1090U”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540E/540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1090U”540/1000/750 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Case-IH JX1090U does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the JX1090U.
Which drives on both axles?4WDOECD test report 2279, 2005; Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1090U”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2004–20081990–1995Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH JX1090U is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH JX1090U has 32% more hydraulic flow (15.0 L/min / 4.0 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Case-IH JX1090U does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Case-IH JX1090U is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the JX1090U: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 2279); the AgroXtra 4.57: power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 4.57”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources