Case-IH JX 1070 U (A) or Renault 75-34 MX?
Which should you choose?
The figures split: the Case-IH JX 1070 U (A) is ahead on hydraulic flow; the Renault 75-34 MX is ahead on maximum permissible mass.
- The Case-IH JX 1070 U (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 24% (10.5 L/min / 2.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Renault 75-34 MX suits road haulage better on this data: 11% (600 kg / 1,323 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | JX 1070 U (A) | 75-34 MX | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 44.4 kW (59.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1070U” | 44.3 kW (59.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3142” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the JX 1070 U (A) and the 75-34 MX. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the JX 1070 U (A) and the 75-34 MX. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 53.9 L/min (14.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1070U” | 43.4 L/min (11.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3142” | AheadThe Case-IH JX 1070 U (A) has 24% more hydraulic flow (10.5 L/min / 2.8 gpm) than the Renault 75-34 MX (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,550 kg (10,031 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1070U” | 4,570 kg (10,075 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3142” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,530 kg (7,782 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1070U” | 3,670 kg (8,091 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3142” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1070U” | 6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3142” | AheadThe Renault 75-34 MX has 11% higher maximum permissible mass (600 kg / 1,323 lb) than the Case-IH JX 1070 U (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1070U” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3142” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the JX 1070 U (A) and the 75-34 MX. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1070U” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3142” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540E/540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1070U” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3142” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1070U” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3142” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1070U” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 75-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3142” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2004–2008 | 1989–1993 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH JX 1070 U (A) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH JX 1070 U (A) has 24% more hydraulic flow (10.5 L/min / 2.8 gpm) than the Renault 75-34 MX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 75-34 MX has 11% higher maximum permissible mass (600 kg / 1,323 lb) than the Case-IH JX 1070 U (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH JX 1070 U (A) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources