Case-IH JX 1075 C or Steyr 375 Kompakt?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Steyr 375 Kompakt: three-point lift. On features, the Case-IH JX 1075 C is ahead on PTO speeds.
- The Case-IH JX 1075 C suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The Steyr 375 Kompakt suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 11% (262 kg / 578 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | JX 1075 C | 375 Kompakt | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 47.5 kW (63.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 47.5 kW (63.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 375 Kompakt” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the JX 1075 C and the 375 Kompakt. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the JX 1075 C and the 375 Kompakt. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 63.9 L/min (16.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 63.9 L/min (16.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 375 Kompakt” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,408 kg (5,309 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 2,670 kg (5,886 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 375 Kompakt” | AheadThe Steyr 375 Kompakt has 11% more lift (262 kg / 578 lb) than the Case-IH JX 1075 C (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,685 kg (5,919 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 2,950 kg (6,504 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 375 Kompakt” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 375 Kompakt” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 44Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 375 Kompakt” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the JX 1075 C and the 375 Kompakt. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 375 Kompakt” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540E/540/1000E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 430/540/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 375 Kompakt” | AheadThe Case-IH JX 1075 C offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Steyr 375 Kompakt does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 375 Kompakt. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C”; OECD test report 2114, 2004; OECD test report 2149, 2004 | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 375 Kompakt” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2003–2008 | 2004–2008 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Steyr 375 Kompakt has 11% more lift (262 kg / 578 lb) than the Case-IH JX 1075 C (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH JX 1075 C offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Steyr 375 Kompakt does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources