Case-IH JX 1075 C or New Holland T 5030?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the JX 1075 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 5030 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The New Holland T 5030 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 99% (2,392 kg / 5,273 lb) more three-point lift.
- The New Holland T 5030 suits road haulage better on this data: 29% (1,400 kg / 3,086 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | JX 1075 C | T 5030 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 55.9 kW (75.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 55.9 kW (75.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the JX 1075 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 5030 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the JX 1075 C and the T 5030. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the JX 1075 C and the T 5030. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 63.9 L/min (16.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 62.5 L/min (16.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,408 kg (5,309 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | AheadThe New Holland T 5030 has 99% more lift (2,392 kg / 5,273 lb) than the Case-IH JX 1075C (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,685 kg (5,919 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 3,750 kg (8,267 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland T 5030 is 40% heavier (1,065 kg / 2,348 lb) than the Case-IH JX 1075C (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 6,200 kg (13,669 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | AheadThe New Holland T 5030 has 29% higher maximum permissible mass (1,400 kg / 3,086 lb) than the Case-IH JX 1075C (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 44Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the JX 1075 C and the T 5030. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540E/540/1000E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5030” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2003–2008 | 2008–2012 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland T 5030 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland T 5030 has 99% more lift (2,392 kg / 5,273 lb) than the Case-IH JX 1075C (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland T 5030 is 40% heavier (1,065 kg / 2,348 lb) than the Case-IH JX 1075C (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland T 5030 has 29% higher maximum permissible mass (1,400 kg / 3,086 lb) than the Case-IH JX 1075C (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland T 5030 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the JX 1075 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 5030 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources