Case-IH JX 1075 C or Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 85?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the JX 1075 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrofarm 85 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH JX 1075C suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 15% (8.4 L/min / 2.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 85 suits road haulage better on this data: 27% (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | JX 1075 C | Agrofarm 85 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 55.9 kW (75.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 55.9 kW (75.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 85” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the JX 1075 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrofarm 85 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the JX 1075 C and the Agrofarm 85. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the JX 1075 C and the Agrofarm 85. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 63.9 L/min (16.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 55.5 L/min (14.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 85” | AheadThe Case-IH JX 1075C has 15% more hydraulic flow (8.4 L/min / 2.2 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 85 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,408 kg (5,309 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Agrofarm 85. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,685 kg (5,919 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 3,800 kg (8,378 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 85” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 85 is 42% heavier (1,115 kg / 2,458 lb) than the Case-IH JX 1075C (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 6,100 kg (13,448 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 85” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 85 has 27% higher maximum permissible mass (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) than the Case-IH JX 1075C (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 44Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 20Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 85” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the JX 1075 C and the Agrofarm 85. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 85” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540E/540/1000E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 85” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 85” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1075C” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 85” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2003–2008 | 2007–2008 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH JX 1075C has 15% more hydraulic flow (8.4 L/min / 2.2 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 85 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 85 is 42% heavier (1,115 kg / 2,458 lb) than the Case-IH JX 1075C (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 85 has 27% higher maximum permissible mass (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) than the Case-IH JX 1075C (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the JX 1075 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrofarm 85 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources