Case-IH JX 1070 C vs New Holland TN 70 DA/SA

5 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

Case-IH JX 1070 C

2003–2008

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

New Holland TN 70 DA/SA

2003–2008

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the JX 1070 C and the TN 70 DA/SA → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

5 material differences · 11 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH JX 1070 C and New Holland TN 70 DA/SA, field by field
FieldJX 1070 CTN 70 DA/SAGap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed71 hp71 hp
Engine declaredIVECO 8035.25 RIVECO 8045.05differs
Displacement declared2.93 L2.93 L
Maximum torque declared190 lb·ft · 258 N·m192 lb·ft · 260 N·m
Transmission
Top speed declared18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h
Clutch declaredDry LuK double clutchDry LuK double clutch
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared13.8 gpm · 52.3 L/min12.4 gpm · 47.0 L/min+11% JX 1070 C
Pressure declared2,466 psi · 170 bar
Three-point lift at ends declared5,362 lb · 2,432 kg5,351 lb · 2,427 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared540E/540/1000E/1000 rpm540/540E/1000 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared5,919 lb · 2,685 kg5,020 lb · 2,277 kg+18% JX 1070 C
Maximum permissible mass declared10,582 lb · 4,800 kg
Wheelbase declared81.3 in · 2,065 mm81.5 in · 2,070 mm
Length declared144.2 in · 3,662 mm141.8 in · 3,601 mm
Width declared73.5 in · 1,867 mm73.5 in · 1,867 mm
Height declared94.9 in · 2,410 mm97.5 in · 2,476 mm
Ground clearance declared13.9 in · 353 mm13.9 in · 353 mm
Fuel tank declared79.3 qt · 75.0 L56.0 qt · 53.0 L+42% JX 1070 C

Case-IH JX 1070 C sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1070C”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 370 Kompakt”

New Holland TN 70 DA/SA sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN70 DA/SA”