Case-IH JX 1060 C or New Holland 4135 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the JX 1060 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4135 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH JX 1060C suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 51% (17.6 L/min / 4.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Case-IH JX 1060C suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (950 kg / 2,094 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | JX 1060 C | 4135 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1060C” | 40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the JX 1060 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4135 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the JX 1060 C and the 4135 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the JX 1060 C and the 4135 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 52.1 L/min (13.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1060C” | 34.5 L/min (9.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135” | AheadThe Case-IH JX 1060C has 51% more hydraulic flow (17.6 L/min / 4.6 gpm) than the New Holland 4135 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the JX 1060 C. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,165 kg (6,978 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1060C” | 2,635 kg (5,809 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH JX 1060C is 20% heavier (530 kg / 1,168 lb) than the New Holland 4135 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1060C” | 3,850 kg (8,488 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135” | AheadThe Case-IH JX 1060C has 25% higher maximum permissible mass (950 kg / 2,094 lb) than the New Holland 4135 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 44Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1060C” | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the JX 1060 C. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1060C” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540E/540/1000E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1060C” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135” | AheadThe Case-IH JX 1060C offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the New Holland 4135 (A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the JX 1060 C and the 4135 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WD / 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX1060C”; OECD test report 2156, 2004; OECD test report 2157, 2004 | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2003–2008 | 1996–1999 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH JX 1060C is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH JX 1060C has 51% more hydraulic flow (17.6 L/min / 4.6 gpm) than the New Holland 4135 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH JX 1060C is 20% heavier (530 kg / 1,168 lb) than the New Holland 4135 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH JX 1060C has 25% higher maximum permissible mass (950 kg / 2,094 lb) than the New Holland 4135 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH JX 1060C offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the New Holland 4135 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Case-IH JX 1060C is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the JX 1060 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4135 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources