Case-IH CX 90 or Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the CX 90 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ares 546 RX/RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ suits road haulage better on this data: 29% (1,760 kg / 3,880 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH CX 90 and Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ, with the call on each
QuestionCX 90Ares 546 RX/RZCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?66.2 kW (88.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”66.2 kW (88.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CX 90 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ares 546 RX/RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the CX 90 and the Ares 546 RX/RZ.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the CX 90 and the Ares 546 RX/RZ.
Which pumps more oil for implements?64.3 L/min (17.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”—No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Ares 546 RX/RZ.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,972 kg (6,552 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”8,640 kg (19,048 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the CX 90: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”); the Ares 546 RX/RZ: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,705 kg (8,168 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”5,165 kg (11,387 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ is 39% heavier (1,460 kg / 3,219 lb) than the Case-IH CX 90 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”7,760 kg (17,108 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ”AheadThe Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ has 29% higher maximum permissible mass (1,760 kg / 3,880 lb) than the Case-IH CX 90 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”32Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ”Sources disagreeNo call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the CX 90.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the CX 90 and the Ares 546 RX/RZ.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”; OECD test report 1898, 20004WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1998–20002002–2004EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ is 39% heavier (1,460 kg / 3,219 lb) than the Case-IH CX 90 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ has 29% higher maximum permissible mass (1,760 kg / 3,880 lb) than the Case-IH CX 90 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CX 90 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ares 546 RX/RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the CX 90: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”); the Ares 546 RX/RZ: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 546 RX/RZ”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the CX 90.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources