Case-IH CX 90 or New Holland TS 100 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the CX 90 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TS 100 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The New Holland TS 100 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 34% (21.7 L/min / 5.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH CX 90 and New Holland TS 100 (A), with the call on each
QuestionCX 90TS 100 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?66.2 kW (88.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”66.2 kW (88.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS100”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CX 90 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TS 100 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the CX 90 and the TS 100 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the CX 90 and the TS 100 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?64.3 L/min (17.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”86.0 L/min (22.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS100”AheadThe New Holland TS 100 (A) has 34% more hydraulic flow (21.7 L/min / 5.7 gpm) than the Case-IH CX 90 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,972 kg (6,552 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”4,294 kg (9,467 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS100”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the CX 90: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”); the TS 100 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS100”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,705 kg (8,168 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”3,929 kg (8,662 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS100”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS100”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS100”Sources disagreeNo call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the CX 90.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the CX 90 and the TS 100 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS100”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS100”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the TS 100 (A).
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”; OECD test report 1898, 2000Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS100”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1998–20001997–2003EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland TS 100 (A) has 34% more hydraulic flow (21.7 L/min / 5.7 gpm) than the Case-IH CX 90 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CX 90 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TS 100 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the CX 90: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX90”); the TS 100 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TS100”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the CX 90.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources