Case-IH CX 100 or Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the CX 100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Euro Trac 1000 CVT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH CX 100 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 11% (5.9 L/min / 1.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | CX 100 | Euro Trac 1000 CVT | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 75 kW (101 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100” | 75 kW (101 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CX 100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Euro Trac 1000 CVT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the CX 100 and the Euro Trac 1000 CVT. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the CX 100 and the Euro Trac 1000 CVT. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 60.8 L/min (16.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100” | 54.9 L/min (14.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT” | AheadThe Case-IH CX 100 has 11% more hydraulic flow (5.9 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,835 kg (8,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Euro Trac 1000 CVT. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,235 kg (9,337 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100” | 4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Euro Trac 1000 CVT. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 24 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100” | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Case-IH CX 100 has 8 to 24 forward gears and the Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT is stepless (CVT) — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the CX 100 and the Euro Trac 1000 CVT. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX100”; OECD test report 1899, 2000 | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1998–2000 | 1992 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH CX 100 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH CX 100 has 11% more hydraulic flow (5.9 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH CX 100 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the Case-IH CX 100 has 8 to 24 forward gears and the Schlüter Euro Trac 1000 CVT is stepless (CVT) — not called.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CX 100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Euro Trac 1000 CVT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources