Case-IH CX 100 vs Massey Ferguson MF 3090 (A)

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1998–2000

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1986–1990

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the CX 100 and the MF 3090 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 7 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH CX 100 and Massey Ferguson MF 3090 (A), field by field
Field	CX 100	MF 3090 (A)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	101 hp	105.7 hp	—
Engine declared	PERKINS-FASTRAM 1004-40 Turbo-HR	Perkins A 6.354-4 TW	differs
Displacement declared	3.99 L	5.80 L	+45% MF 3090 (A)
Maximum torque declared	268 lb·ft · 364 N·m	289 lb·ft · 392 N·m	+8% MF 3090 (A)
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated dry single-disc clutch as driving clutch	Pedal-operated, dry and air-cooled VALEO single-plate clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	16.1 gpm · 60.8 L/min	13.5 gpm · 51.2 L/min	+19% CX 100
Pressure declared	2,698 psi · 186 bar	2,277–2,350 psi · 157–162 bar	differs
Three-point lift at ends declared	8,455 lb · 3,835 kg	8,543 lb · 3,875 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	9,337 lb · 4,235 kg	9,237 lb · 4,190 kg	—
Maximum permissible mass declared	13,228 lb · 6,000 kg	15,432 lb · 7,000 kg	+17% MF 3090 (A)
Wheelbase declared	92.8 in · 2,356 mm	106.1 in · 2,696 mm	+14% MF 3090 (A)
Length declared	176.0 in · 4,470 mm	170.2 in · 4,323 mm	—
Width declared	83.1 in · 2,110 mm	74.8 in · 1,899 mm	+11% CX 100
Height declared	108.1 in · 2,745 mm	109.2 in · 2,774 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	13.0 in · 330 mm	18.0 in · 457 mm	+38% MF 3090 (A)
Turning radius, braked declared	19.7 ft · 6.01 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	163.8 qt · 155.0 L	200.8 qt · 190.0 L	+23% MF 3090 (A)

Source

Source