Case-IH CX 70 or SAME Explorer 70 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the CX 70: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 1895); the Explorer 70 (DT): power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 70”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | CX 70 | Explorer 70 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 46.3 kW (62.1 hp)OECD Test 1895 | 46.0 kW (61.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 70” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CX 70: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 1895); the Explorer 70 (DT): power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 70”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the CX 70 and the Explorer 70 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | 41.1 kW (55.1 hp)OECD Test 1895 | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Explorer 70 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 53.0 L/min (14.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX70” | 36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 70” | AheadThe Case-IH CX 70 has 47% more hydraulic flow (17.0 L/min / 4.5 gpm) than the SAME Explorer 70 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,988 kg (4,383 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX70” | 3,430 kg (7,562 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 70” | AheadThe SAME Explorer 70 (DT) has 73% more lift (1,442 kg / 3,179 lb) than the Case-IH CX 70 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,185 kg (7,022 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX70” | 2,760 kg (6,085 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 70” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH CX 70 is 15% heavier (425 kg / 937 lb) than the SAME Explorer 70 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX70” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Explorer 70 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16OECD test report 1895, 2000 | 12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 70” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the CX 70 and the Explorer 70 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX70” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 70” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmOECD test report 1895, 2000 | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 70” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 70” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the CX 70. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDOECD test report 1895, 2000; Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX70” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 70” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1998–2000 | 1986–1990 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH CX 70 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH CX 70 has 47% more hydraulic flow (17.0 L/min / 4.5 gpm) than the SAME Explorer 70 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The SAME Explorer 70 (DT) has 73% more lift (1,442 kg / 3,179 lb) than the Case-IH CX 70 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH CX 70 is 15% heavier (425 kg / 937 lb) than the SAME Explorer 70 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH CX 70 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CX 70: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 1895); the Explorer 70 (DT): power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Explorer 70”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources