Case-IH CX 70 or Fiat 72-94 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the CX 70: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 1895); the 72-94 (DT): power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.

  • The Case-IH CX 70 suits road haulage better on this data: 13% (700 kg / 1,543 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH CX 70 and Fiat 72-94 (DT), with the call on each
QuestionCX 7072-94 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?46.3 kW (62.1 hp)OECD Test 189546.5 kW (62.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CX 70: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 1895); the 72-94 (DT): power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the CX 70 and the 72-94 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?41.1 kW (55.1 hp)OECD Test 1895No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 72-94 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?53.0 L/min (14.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX70”44.5 L/min (11.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”AheadThe Case-IH CX 70 has 19% more hydraulic flow (8.5 L/min / 2.2 gpm) than the Fiat 72-94 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,988 kg (4,383 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX70”3,500 kg (7,716 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”AheadThe Fiat 72-94 (DT) has 76% more lift (1,512 kg / 3,333 lb) than the Case-IH CX 70 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,185 kg (7,022 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX70”3,460 kg (7,628 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX70”5,300 kg (11,684 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”AheadThe Case-IH CX 70 has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (700 kg / 1,543 lb) than the Fiat 72-94 (DT) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16OECD test report 1895, 200012 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the CX 70 and the 72-94 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX70”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmOECD test report 1895, 2000540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the CX 70.
Which drives on both axles?4WDOECD test report 1895, 2000; Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CX70”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1998–20001993–1996Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH CX 70 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH CX 70 has 19% more hydraulic flow (8.5 L/min / 2.2 gpm) than the Fiat 72-94 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat 72-94 (DT) has 76% more lift (1,512 kg / 3,333 lb) than the Case-IH CX 70 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH CX 70 has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (700 kg / 1,543 lb) than the Fiat 72-94 (DT) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH CX 70 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CX 70: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 1895); the 72-94 (DT): power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources