Case-IH CX 60 vs VALMET 465 (465-4)

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1998–2000

56.5 hp

Measured at the PTO · OECD Test 1894

Tractor two

1993–1997

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the CX 60 and the 465 (465-4) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH CX 60 and VALMET 465 (465-4), field by field
Field	CX 60	465 (465-4)	Gap
Measured performance
PTO power, measured measured	56.5 hp	—	—
Drawbar power, measured measured	47.6 hp	—	—
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	—	69.1 hp	—
Engine declared	Perkins 1942/2250	VALMET 320 DS	differs
Displacement declared	2.70 L	3.30 L	+22% 465 (465-4)
Maximum torque declared	161 lb·ft · 218.0 N·m	192 lb·ft · 260 N·m	+19% 465 (465-4)
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	pedal-operated dry single-disc clutch	dry LuK double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	—	Open centre	—
Pump flow declared	14.0 gpm · 53.0 L/min	14.5 gpm · 55.0 L/min	—
Pressure declared	2,698 psi · 186 bar	2,901 psi · 200 bar	+8% 465 (465-4)
Three-point lift at ends declared	4,453 lb · 2,020 kg	5,688 lb · 2,580 kg	+28% 465 (465-4)
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540E/540 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	6,923 lb · 3,140 kg	6,217 lb · 2,820 kg	+11% CX 60
Maximum permissible mass declared	13,228 lb · 6,000 kg	—	—
Wheelbase declared	84.8 in · 2,154 mm	83.1 in · 2,112 mm	—
Length declared	152.0 in · 3,860 mm	146.1 in · 3,710 mm	—
Width declared	82.7 in · 2,100 mm	79.9 in · 2,030 mm	—
Height declared	99.2 in · 2,520 mm	102.6 in · 2,605 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	13.0 in · 330 mm	15.9 in · 405 mm	+23% 465 (465-4)
Turning radius, braked declared	—	11.5 ft · 3.50 m	—
Fuel tank declared	163.8 qt · 155.0 L	77.1 qt · 73.0 L	+112% CX 60

Source

Source