Case-IH CX 60 vs Ford 5030 (A)

14 material differences

Tractor one

1998–2000

56.5 hp

Measured at the PTO · OECD Test 1894

Tractor two

1992–1996

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the CX 60 and the 5030 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

14 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH CX 60 and Ford 5030 (A), field by field
Field	CX 60	5030 (A)	Gap
Measured performance
PTO power, measured measured	56.5 hp	—	—
Drawbar power, measured measured	47.6 hp	—	—
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	—	69.1 hp	—
Engine declared	Perkins 1942/2250	Ford C 256 CID-NA	differs
Displacement declared	2.70 L	4.19 L	+55% 5030 (A)
Maximum torque declared	161 lb·ft · 218.0 N·m	176 lb·ft · 239 N·m	+10% 5030 (A)
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	pedal-operated dry single-disc clutch	Pedal operated dry AP single plate clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	—	Open centre	—
Pump flow declared	14.0 gpm · 53.0 L/min	9.2 gpm · 34.8 L/min	+52% CX 60
Pressure declared	2,698 psi · 186 bar	1,508 psi · 104 bar	+79% CX 60
Three-point lift at ends declared	4,453 lb · 2,020 kg	4,381 lb · 1,987 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	6,923 lb · 3,140 kg	6,217 lb · 2,820 kg	+11% CX 60
Maximum permissible mass declared	13,228 lb · 6,000 kg	—	—
Wheelbase declared	84.8 in · 2,154 mm	89.6 in · 2,276 mm	+6% 5030 (A)
Length declared	152.0 in · 3,860 mm	143.7 in · 3,650 mm	+6% CX 60
Width declared	82.7 in · 2,100 mm	72.2 in · 1,835 mm	+14% CX 60
Height declared	99.2 in · 2,520 mm	100.3 in · 2,548 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	13.0 in · 330 mm	13.9 in · 353 mm	+7% 5030 (A)
Fuel tank declared	163.8 qt · 155.0 L	69.4 qt · 65.7 L	+136% CX 60

Source

Source