Case-IH CX 50 vs Massey Ferguson MF 4215 (A)

8 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1998–2000

42.5 hp

Measured at the PTO · OECD Test 1893

Tractor two

1997–2001

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the CX 50 and the MF 4215 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

8 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH CX 50 and Massey Ferguson MF 4215 (A), field by field
Field	CX 50	MF 4215 (A)	Gap
Measured performance
PTO power, measured measured	42.5 hp	—	—
Drawbar power, measured measured	35.4 hp	—	—
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	—	51.4 hp	—
Engine declared	Perkins 1962/2250	Perkins 903.27	differs
Displacement declared	2.70 L	2.70 L	—
Maximum torque declared	121 lb·ft · 164.0 N·m	136 lb·ft · 184 N·m	+12% MF 4215 (A)
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated dry single-disc clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	—	Open centre	—
Pump flow declared	14.0 gpm · 53.0 L/min	—	—
Pressure declared	2,698 psi · 186 bar	2,031 psi · 140 bar	+33% CX 50
Three-point lift at ends declared	4,451 lb · 2,019 kg	4,718 lb · 2,140 kg	+6% MF 4215 (A)
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	7,110 lb · 3,225 kg	5,258 lb · 2,385 kg	+35% CX 50
Maximum permissible mass declared	13,228 lb · 6,000 kg	—	—
Wheelbase declared	84.8 in · 2,154 mm	83.9 in · 2,130 mm	—
Length declared	150.8 in · 3,830 mm	149.0 in · 3,785 mm	—
Width declared	79.5 in · 2,020 mm	78.0 in · 1,982 mm	—
Height declared	97.2 in · 2,470 mm	99.0 in · 2,515 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	12.4 in · 315 mm	8.3 in · 210 mm	+50% CX 50
Fuel tank declared	163.8 qt · 155.0 L	90.9 qt · 86.0 L	+80% CX 50

Source

Source