Case-IH CS-94 vs WHITE 100

12 material differences

Tractor one

1995–2003

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1987–1990

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the CS-94 and the 100 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

12 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH CS-94 and WHITE 100, field by field
Field	CS-94	100	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	92.7 hp	92.0 hp	—
Engine declared	MWM WD 401.85	CUMMINS B 6-590	differs
Displacement declared	—	5.89 L	—
Maximum torque declared	—	261 lb·ft · 354 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Dry double clutch, pedal-operated drive clutch, hand lever-operated PTO clutch	Pedal-operated dry single-disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	—	Open centre	—
Pump flow declared	14.1 gpm · 53.3 L/min	19.0 gpm · 71.9 L/min	+35% 100
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	7,189 lb · 3,261 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	390/540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	8,609 lb · 3,905 kg	12,000 lb · 5,443 kg	+39% 100
Maximum permissible mass declared	14,330 lb · 6,500 kg	—	—
Wheelbase declared	97.5 in · 2,477 mm	111.5 in · 2,832 mm	+14% 100
Length declared	165.7 in · 4,210 mm	173.2 in · 4,400 mm	—
Width declared	86.6 in · 2,200 mm	96.0 in · 2,438 mm	+11% 100
Height declared	100.4 in · 2,550 mm	117.2 in · 2,978 mm	+17% 100
Ground clearance declared	17.7 in · 450 mm	26.3 in · 667 mm	+48% 100
Turning radius, braked declared	15.7 ft · 4.80 m	11.4 ft · 3.48 m	+38% CS-94
Fuel tank declared	105.7 qt · 100.0 L	100.4–132.1 qt · 95.0–125.0 L	differs

Source

Source