Case-IH CS-94 vs Renault 103-14 TX

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1995–2003

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1981–1986

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the CS-94 and the 103-14 TX → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH CS-94 and Renault 103-14 TX, field by field
Field	CS-94	103-14 TX	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	92.7 hp	91.7 hp	—
Engine declared	MWM WD 401.85	MWM TD 226-4	differs
Displacement declared	—	4.16 L	—
Maximum torque declared	—	221 lb·ft · 299 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	15.5–18.6 mph · 25–30 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Dry double clutch, pedal-operated drive clutch, hand lever-operated PTO clutch	Dry LuK double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	14.1 gpm · 53.3 L/min	10.6 gpm · 40.2 L/min	+33% CS-94
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	9,039 lb · 4,100 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	390/540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	8,609 lb · 3,905 kg	10,847 lb · 4,920 kg	+26% 103-14 TX
Maximum permissible mass declared	14,330 lb · 6,500 kg	—	—
Wheelbase declared	97.5 in · 2,477 mm	97.6 in · 2,480 mm	—
Length declared	165.7 in · 4,210 mm	169.4 in · 4,304 mm	—
Width declared	86.6 in · 2,200 mm	80.9 in · 2,055 mm	+7% CS-94
Height declared	100.4 in · 2,550 mm	111.1 in · 2,823 mm	+11% 103-14 TX
Ground clearance declared	17.7 in · 450 mm	19.3 in · 490 mm	+9% 103-14 TX
Turning radius, braked declared	15.7 ft · 4.80 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	105.7 qt · 100.0 L	132.1 qt · 125.0 L	+25% 103-14 TX

Source

Source