Case-IH CS-75 A vs Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.90 F/S

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1994–2001

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1992–1996

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the CS-75 A and the AgroCompact 3.90 F/S → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH CS-75 A and Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.90 F/S, field by field
Field	CS-75 A	AgroCompact 3.90 F/S	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	74.0 hp	74.0 hp	—
Engine declared	MWM 301.88 T	KHD F4L 913	differs
Displacement declared	—	4.09 L	—
Maximum torque declared	—	184 lb·ft · 250 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Dry double clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	10.9 gpm · 41.4 L/min	10.8 gpm · 41.0 L/min	—
Pressure declared	3,481 psi · 240 bar	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	4,850 lb · 2,200 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm / 1000 rpm	540 rpm / 1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	6,834 lb · 3,100 kg	4,960–5,622 lb · 2,250–2,550 kg	differs
Maximum permissible mass declared	9,921 lb · 4,500 kg	8,818 lb · 4,000 kg	+13% CS-75 A
Wheelbase declared	87.8 in · 2,229 mm	80.5 in · 2,045 mm	+9% CS-75 A
Length declared	149.3 in · 3,792 mm	136.6 in · 3,470 mm	+9% CS-75 A
Width declared	74.8 in · 1,900 mm	47.2 in · 1,200 mm	+58% CS-75 A
Height declared	99.0 in · 2,515 mm	82.7 in · 2,100 mm	+20% CS-75 A
Ground clearance declared	15.7 in · 400 mm	13.0 in · 330 mm	+21% CS-75 A
Fuel tank declared	87.7 qt · 83.0 L	58.1 qt · 55 L	+51% CS-75 A

Source

Source