Case-IH CS-63 vs Hürlimann H-60 XA

7 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2001–2004

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2009–2014

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the CS-63 and the H-60 XA → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

7 material differences · 7 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH CS-63 and Hürlimann H-60 XA, field by field
Field	CS-63	H-60 XA	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	62.2 hp	61.2 hp	—
Engine declared	PERKINS 903-27 T	Hürlimann 1000.3 WT	differs
Displacement declared	2.70 L	3.00 L	+11% H-60 XA
Maximum torque declared	176 lb·ft · 239 N·m	177 lb·ft · 240 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Dry double clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic control declared	—	Load sensing	—
Pump flow declared	8.1 gpm · 30.8 L/min	8.4 gpm · 31.9 L/min	—
Pressure declared	—	3,046 psi · 210 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	5,556 lb · 2,520 kg	6,614 lb · 3,000 kg	+19% H-60 XA
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540 rpm / 1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	5,490 lb · 2,490 kg	6,173 lb · 2,800 kg	+12% H-60 XA
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	11,023 lb · 5,000 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	83.3 in · 2,117 mm	80.9 in · 2,056 mm	—
Length declared	139.0 in · 3,530 mm	135.0 in · 3,430 mm	—
Width declared	74.8 in · 1,900 mm	75.6 in · 1,920 mm	—
Height declared	92.9 in · 2,360 mm	94.5 in · 2,400 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	—	14.2 in · 360 mm	—
Turning radius, braked declared	—	12.0 ft · 3.65 m	—
Fuel tank declared	77.1 qt · 73.0 L	95.1 qt · 90.0 L	+23% H-60 XA

Source

Source