Case-IH CS 150 or SAME Titan 145?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the CS 150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Titan 145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH CS 150 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 108% (64.3 L/min / 17.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 26% (1,830 kg / 4,034 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Case-IH CS 150 suits road haulage better on this data: 12% (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | CS 150 | Titan 145 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 106.6 kW (143.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS150” | 106.6 kW (143.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CS 150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Titan 145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the CS 150 and the Titan 145. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the CS 150 and the Titan 145. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 123.8 L/min (32.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS150” | 59.5 L/min (15.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145” | AheadThe Case-IH CS 150 has 108% more hydraulic flow (64.3 L/min / 17.0 gpm) than the SAME Titan 145 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 8,830 kg (19,467 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS150” | 7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145” | AheadThe Case-IH CS 150 has 26% more lift (1,830 kg / 4,034 lb) than the SAME Titan 145 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,010 kg (13,250 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS150” | 5,750 kg (12,677 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 9,500 kg (20,944 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS150” | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145” | AheadThe Case-IH CS 150 has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the SAME Titan 145 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24 to 40Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS150” | 26 to 27Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the CS 150 and the Titan 145. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS150” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/540E/1000E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS150” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS150” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS150” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1997–2003 | 1995–1998 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH CS 150 has 108% more hydraulic flow (64.3 L/min / 17.0 gpm) than the SAME Titan 145 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH CS 150 has 26% more lift (1,830 kg / 4,034 lb) than the SAME Titan 145 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH CS 150 has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the SAME Titan 145 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CS 150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Titan 145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources