Case-IH Magnum 280 vs John Deere 8295 RT
1 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because the drive differs (4WD; Tracks); the 8295 RT is on tracks, not an alternative to an ordinary tractor. The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
1 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | Magnum 280 | 8295 RT | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 275 hp | 291 hp | +6% 8295 RT |
| Maximum torque declared | 949 lb·ft · 1,287 N·m | 966 lb·ft · 1,310 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic centre declared | Closed centre | Closed centre | — |
| Pump flow declared | 43.9 gpm · 166 L/min | — | — |
| Pressure declared | 3,046 psi · 210 bar | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 1000 rpm | 1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 28,440 lb · 12,900 kg | 34,392 lb · 15,600 kg | +21% 8295 RT |
| Wheelbase declared | 118.5 in · 3,010 mm | — | — |
| Length declared | 234.3 in · 5,950 mm | 231.9 in · 5,890 mm | — |
| Width declared | — | 115.0 in · 2,920 mm | — |
| Height declared | 126.0 in · 3,200 mm | 130.7 in · 3,320 mm | — |
Case-IH Magnum 280 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Magnum 280”
- Source: OECD test report 2979, 2016
John Deere 8295 RT sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8295 RT”
- Source: OECD test report 2589, 2011