Case-IH Magnum 280 vs John Deere 8295 R
3 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because the drive differs (4WD; Tracks); the 8295 R is on tracks, not an alternative to an ordinary tractor. The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
3 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | Magnum 280 | 8295 R | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 275 hp | 291 hp | +6% 8295 R |
| Maximum torque declared | 949 lb·ft · 1,287 N·m | 966 lb·ft · 1,310 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | 31.1 mph · 50 km/h | +25% 8295 R |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic centre declared | Closed centre | Closed centre | — |
| Hydraulic control declared | — | Load sensing | — |
| Pump flow declared | 43.9 gpm · 166 L/min | — | — |
| Pressure declared | 3,046 psi · 210 bar | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 28,440 lb · 12,900 kg | 27,448 lb · 12,450 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 118.5 in · 3,010 mm | 118.9 in · 3,020 mm | — |
| Length declared | 234.3 in · 5,950 mm | 220.1 in · 5,590 mm | +6% Magnum 280 |
| Width declared | — | 97.6 in · 2,480 mm | — |
| Height declared | 126.0 in · 3,200 mm | 120.5 in · 3,060 mm | — |
| Fuel tank declared | — | 719.6 qt · 681 L | — |
Case-IH Magnum 280 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Magnum 280”
- Source: OECD test report 2979, 2016
John Deere 8295 R sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8295 R”
- Source: OECD test report 2616