Case-IH CVX 150 or John Deere 7700 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the CVX 150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7700 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH CVX 150 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 24% (23.8 L/min / 6.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 53% (2,940 kg / 6,482 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | CVX 150 | 7700 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 110.4 kW (148.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX150” | 110.4 kW (148.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CVX 150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7700 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the CVX 150 and the 7700 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the CVX 150 and the 7700 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 121.5 L/min (32.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX150” | 97.7 L/min (25.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | AheadThe Case-IH CVX 150 has 24% more hydraulic flow (23.8 L/min / 6.3 gpm) than the John Deere 7700 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX150” | 5,560 kg (12,258 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | AheadThe Case-IH CVX 150 has 53% more lift (2,940 kg / 6,482 lb) than the John Deere 7700 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,300 kg (16,094 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX150” | 6,510 kg (14,352 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH CVX 150 is 12% heavier (790 kg / 1,742 lb) than the John Deere 7700 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 11,000 kg (24,251 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX150” | 11,500 kg (25,353 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX150” | 12 to 20 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Case-IH CVX 150 is stepless (CVT) and the John Deere 7700 (A) has 12 to 20 forward gears — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the CVX 150 and the 7700 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX150” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX150” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the CVX 150. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX150” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 7700” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2000–2003 | 1992–1997 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH CVX 150 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH CVX 150 has 24% more hydraulic flow (23.8 L/min / 6.3 gpm) than the John Deere 7700 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH CVX 150 has 53% more lift (2,940 kg / 6,482 lb) than the John Deere 7700 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH CVX 150 is 12% heavier (790 kg / 1,742 lb) than the John Deere 7700 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH CVX 150 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the Case-IH CVX 150 is stepless (CVT) and the John Deere 7700 (A) has 12 to 20 forward gears — not called.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CVX 150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7700 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources