Case-IH CVX 120 or Renault Ares 626 RX/RZ?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the CVX 120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ares 626 RX/RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH CVX 120 suits road haulage better on this data: 31% (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | CVX 120 | Ares 626 RX/RZ | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 88.3 kW (118.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX120” | 88.3 kW (118.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 626 RX/RZ” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CVX 120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ares 626 RX/RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the CVX 120 and the Ares 626 RX/RZ. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the CVX 120 and the Ares 626 RX/RZ. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 121.5 L/min (32.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX120” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Ares 626 RX/RZ. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX120” | 8,640 kg (19,048 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 626 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,270 kg (13,823 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX120” | 5,860 kg (12,919 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 626 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 10,500 kg (23,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX120” | 8,000 kg (17,637 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 626 RX/RZ” | AheadThe Case-IH CVX 120 has 31% higher maximum permissible mass (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) than the Renault Ares 626 RX/RZ (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX120” | 32 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 626 RX/RZ” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Case-IH CVX 120 is stepless (CVT) and the Renault Ares 626 RX/RZ has 32 forward gears — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the CVX 120 and the Ares 626 RX/RZ. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX120” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 626 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX120” | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 626 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX120” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 626 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX120” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 626 RX/RZ” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2000–2003 | 2002–2003 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH CVX 120 has 31% higher maximum permissible mass (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) than the Renault Ares 626 RX/RZ (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the Case-IH CVX 120 is stepless (CVT) and the Renault Ares 626 RX/RZ has 32 forward gears — not called.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CVX 120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ares 626 RX/RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources