Case-IH CVX 1190 or Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the CVX 1190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH CVX 1190 suits road haulage better on this data: 16% (5.5 km/h / 3.4 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | CVX 1190 | Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 141.2 kW (189.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX1190” | 140 kW (188 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CVX 1190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the CVX 1190 and the Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the CVX 1190 and the Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 54.9 L/min (14.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the CVX 1190. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 9,900 kg (21,826 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX1190” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,520 kg (16,579 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX1190” | 6,900 kg (15,212 lb) to 7,100 kg (15,653 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 11,500 kg (25,353 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX1190” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX1190” | 24 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Case-IH CVX 1190 is stepless (CVT) and the Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS has 24 forward gears — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the CVX 1190 and the Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX1190” | 34.5 km/h (21.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS” | AheadThe Case-IH CVX 1190 has 16% more top speed (5.5 km/h / 3.4 mph) than the Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX1190” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX1190” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX1190” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2003–2005 | 1991–1995 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH CVX 1190 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH CVX 1190 has 16% more top speed (5.5 km/h / 3.4 mph) than the Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH CVX 1190 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the Case-IH CVX 1190 is stepless (CVT) and the Schlüter Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS has 24 forward gears — not called.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CVX 1190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Euro Trac 1900/2000 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources