Case-IH CVX 1190 or Fendt Favorit 818?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the CVX 1190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 818 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | CVX 1190 | Favorit 818 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 141.2 kW (189.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX1190” | 140 kW (188 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 818” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CVX 1190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 818 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the CVX 1190 and the Favorit 818. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the CVX 1190 and the Favorit 818. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 102.0 L/min (26.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 818” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the CVX 1190. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 9,900 kg (21,826 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX1190” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Favorit 818. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,520 kg (16,579 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX1190” | 7,680 kg (16,932 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 818” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 11,500 kg (25,353 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX1190” | 12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 818” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX1190” | 44 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 818” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Case-IH CVX 1190 is stepless (CVT) and the Fendt Favorit 818 has 44 forward gears — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 818” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the CVX 1190. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX1190” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 818” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX1190” | 750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 818” | DifferPTO speeds differ: the Case-IH CVX 1190 540/1000 rpm and the Fendt Favorit 818 750/1000 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX1190” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Favorit 818. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CVX1190” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 818” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2003–2005 | 1993–2002 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH CVX 1190 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH CVX 1190 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the Case-IH CVX 1190 is stepless (CVT) and the Fendt Favorit 818 has 44 forward gears — not called.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- PTO speeds differ: the Case-IH CVX 1190 540/1000 rpm and the Fendt Favorit 818 750/1000 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the CVX 1190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 818 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources