Case-IH 833 or ZETOR 7211/7245?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 833 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7211/7245 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Case-IH 833 suits road haulage better on this data: 28% (7.0 km/h / 4.3 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH 833 and ZETOR 7211/7245, with the call on each
Question8337211/7245Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?49 kW (66 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 833”48.5 kW (65.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7211”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 833 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7211/7245 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 833 and the 7211/7245.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 833 and the 7211/7245.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—56.6 L/min (15.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7211”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 833.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,530 kg (3,372 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 833”—No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 7211/7245.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,580 kg (5,688 lb) to 3,110 kg (6,856 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 833”3,190 kg (7,033 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7211”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 833 and the 7211/7245.
Which has the wider choice of gears?—10 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7211”No figureNo call on forward gears: no figure on record for the 833.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 833 and the 7211/7245.
Which is faster on the road?32 km/h (19.9 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 833”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7211”AheadThe Case-IH 833 has 28% more top speed (7.0 km/h / 4.3 mph) than the ZETOR 7211/7245 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?—540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7211”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the 833.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7211”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 833.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 833”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7211”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1981–19901984–1993EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH 833 has 28% more top speed (7.0 km/h / 4.3 mph) than the ZETOR 7211/7245 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 833 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7211/7245 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, forward gears, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources