Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950 or Massey Ferguson MF 8460?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Massey Ferguson MF 8460: hydraulic flow, three-point lift and maximum permissible mass. It is also ahead on PTO speeds.
- The Massey Ferguson MF 8460 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 540 rpm.
- The Massey Ferguson MF 8460 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 33% (37.6 L/min / 9.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 46% (3,357 kg / 7,401 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Massey Ferguson MF 8460 suits road haulage better on this data: 21% (2,425 kg / 5,346 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 7250 PRO/8950 | MF 8460 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 169.4 kW (227.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950” | 172.4 kW (231.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8460” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 7250 PRO/8950 and the MF 8460. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 7250 PRO/8950 and the MF 8460. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 112.4 L/min (29.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950” | 150.0 L/min (39.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8460” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 8460 has 33% more hydraulic flow (37.6 L/min / 9.9 gpm) than the Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 7,350 kg (16,204 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950” | 10,707 kg (23,605 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8460” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 8460 has 46% more lift (3,357 kg / 7,401 lb) than the Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,318 kg (18,338 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950” | 9,040 kg (19,930 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8460” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 11,575 kg (25,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950” | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8460” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 8460 has 21% higher maximum permissible mass (2,425 kg / 5,346 lb) than the Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950” | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8460” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950 has 24 forward gears and the Massey Ferguson MF 8460 is stepless (CVT) — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 8460. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8460” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950” | 540/1000/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8460” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 8460 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 7250 PRO/8950 and the MF 8460. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8460” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1997–1999 | 2004–2008 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 8460 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson MF 8460 has 33% more hydraulic flow (37.6 L/min / 9.9 gpm) than the Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 8460 has 46% more lift (3,357 kg / 7,401 lb) than the Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 8460 has 21% higher maximum permissible mass (2,425 kg / 5,346 lb) than the Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 8460 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 8460 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the Case-IH 7250 PRO/8950 has 24 forward gears and the Massey Ferguson MF 8460 is stepless (CVT) — not called.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources