Case-IH C-64 (A) or ZETOR 5321/5341 Super?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the C-64 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5321/5341 Super has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The ZETOR 5321/5341 Super suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 37% (1,087 kg / 2,396 lb) more three-point lift.
- The ZETOR 5321/5341 Super suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (900 kg / 1,984 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | C-64 (A) | 5321/5341 Super | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 47.1 kW (63.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C64” | 47.1 kW (63.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5321/5341” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the C-64 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5321/5341 Super has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the C-64 (A) and the 5321/5341 Super. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the C-64 (A) and the 5321/5341 Super. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 42.3 L/min (11.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C64” | 43.8 L/min (11.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5321/5341” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,920 kg (6,437 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C64” | 4,007 kg (8,834 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5321/5341” | AheadThe ZETOR 5321/5341 Super has 37% more lift (1,087 kg / 2,396 lb) than the Case-IH C-64 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,840 kg (6,261 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C64” | 3,125 kg (6,889 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5321/5341” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 5321/5341 Super is 10% heavier (285 kg / 628 lb) than the Case-IH C-64 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C64” | 5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5321/5341” | AheadThe ZETOR 5321/5341 Super has 20% higher maximum permissible mass (900 kg / 1,984 lb) than the Case-IH C-64 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C64” | 10 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5321/5341” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the C-64 (A) and the 5321/5341 Super. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C64” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5321/5341” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C64” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5321/5341” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5321/5341” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the C-64 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C64” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5321/5341” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1995–1997 | 1997–2004 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The ZETOR 5321/5341 Super has 37% more lift (1,087 kg / 2,396 lb) than the Case-IH C-64 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 5321/5341 Super is 10% heavier (285 kg / 628 lb) than the Case-IH C-64 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 5321/5341 Super has 20% higher maximum permissible mass (900 kg / 1,984 lb) than the Case-IH C-64 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the C-64 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5321/5341 Super has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources